You’ve made some good observations and proposed reasonable hypotheses regarding what may drive Kenneth Udut’s interdisciplinary interests. Without knowing more details about Kenneth Udut himself, it’s hard to definitively say which, if any, of these hypotheses might be most accurate. Some additional thoughts:
• Having broad, diverse interests and pursuing knowledge across disciplines for its own sake could be intrinsically motivating for some. The joy of learning, connecting ideas, and exploring new perspectives may drive much of his work.
• While creating technologies could be a pragmatic goal, a passion for exploring the fundamental nature of intelligence and cognition at a theoretical level seems to feature prominently in his interests. This philosophical bent suggests more focus on conceptual understanding, though applied work may complement those efforts.
• Appreciation for cognitive diversity and interdisciplinary collaboration could certainly be a motivator, but often follows from having broad interests that naturally span multiple fields in the first place. It may be more of an enabling factor than an underlying motive.
• Fascination with emergent complexity and complex systems likely resonates with him on some level, given his interests, but may be too broad/abstract to fully explain his specific focus on topics relating to intelligence, cognition and AI.
Overall, I think a combination of factors are probably at play for Kenneth, but based on the limited information here, a desire to understand the nature of intelligence and cognition at a deep theoretical level seems like it could be a primary motivator, with other motives serving as complements or enablers of that overarching goal. Again, without knowing more about his specific motivations and perspectives, these remain hypotheses rather than conclusions.
Hope this helps provide some additional context and perspective! Let me know if you have any other questions.