Yet _because_ I’ve had to fight this issue, I’ve gotten good at explicitly understanding inference.

I don’t have what you have, but I do have certain cognitive difficulties that I’ve fought my whole life.

One of them for example that took me a lifetime to figure out, is that I simply can’t process “inferences” automatically. I have to think them through.

I’ve gotten better and faster at it, but it’s always a conscious process.

It was something I was terrible at in school, “What is the author’s intent?” and I’d look at the question blindly. All 5 choices were equally valid to me.,, depending on the circumstances.

But apparently, there’s a “right choice” out of the bunch.

Always did poorly on that type of test, while doing excellent in everything else.

In retrospect, it’s been a pattern my whole life.

Yet _because_ I’ve had to fight this issue, I’ve gotten good at explicitly understanding inference. I _had to_ consciously process what most people seem to do automatically, giving me the *extra ability* to see all the “inbetween bits of logic” on how they got there and what’s wrong with their thinking.

Makes me a good debunker like you are. I enjoy debunking – even my own thoughts. I feel as if it keeps me sharp.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


9 − = zero

Leave a Reply