Why? “there doesn’t seem to be a reason not to” (DKL) ontological pluralism: “There are numbers, fictional characters, impossible things, and holes. But, we don’t think these things all exist in the same sense as cars and human beings.” Ontological pluralism is my placeholder for [ken fill this in], David Kellogg Lewis’ model realism is my placeholder for [ken fill this in2] but it is related to Church’s Typed Lambda Calculus somehow I think. Embodied cognition (family – no specific one) is my placeholder for [ken fill this in3] Church’s Untyped Lambda Calculus is my placeholder for [ken fill this in4] but it is related to Emergence Church’s Typed Lambda Calculus is my placeholder for [ken fill this in5] but it is related to ontological pluralism. Emergence is my placeholder for [ken fill this in6] but it is related to Church’s Untyped Lambda Calculus somehow and folding.

Why? “there doesn’t seem to be a reason not to” (DKL)
 
ontological pluralism:
“There are numbers, fictional characters, impossible things, and holes. But, we don’t think these things all exist in the same sense as cars and human beings.”
 
Ontological pluralism is my placeholder for [ken fill this in],
 
David Kellogg Lewis’ model realism is my placeholder for [ken fill this in2] but it is related to Church’s Typed Lambda Calculus somehow I think.
 
Embodied cognition (family – no specific one) is my placeholder for [ken fill this in3]
 
Church’s Untyped Lambda Calculus is my placeholder for [ken fill this in4] but it is related to Emergence
 
Church’s Typed Lambda Calculus is my placeholder for [ken fill this in5] but it is related to ontological pluralism.
 
Emergence is my placeholder for [ken fill this in6] but it is related to Church’s Untyped Lambda Calculus somehow and folding.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


seven × 9 =

Leave a Reply