Whether it’s a good approach or not I got here anyway. They are considered complimentary but different; (compatibles at bottom)
SUMMARY:
Of the “Different but in the same field”
Udut Compatible Thinkers:
Human experience, Interdisciplinary thinking, Critical examination, Personal growth, Meaning & value
Jordan Peterson Compatible Thinkers:
Archetypal psychology, Hierarchies, Order & chaos, Personal responsibility, Meaning & value
(I had the ChatGPT4 come up with HYPOTHETICAL contrasting thinkers that seemed compatible to Jordan Peterson’s — (contrasting with the thinkers I like) and in what areas. It generalized the “Udut Compatible Thinkers” vs “Jordan Peterson compatible thinkers” thusly)
at greater length:
ChatGPT4:
The meaning and value in the works of “Udut Compatible Thinkers” and “Jordan Peterson Compatible Thinkers” can be seen as complementary rather than contrasting. Both groups of thinkers explore the importance of meaning and value in human life, but they may approach these topics from different perspectives or emphasize different aspects.
Udut Compatible Thinkers, who are “different but in the same field” as Jordan Peterson, often focus on the interconnectedness of human experience, interdisciplinary thinking, and the critical examination of existing ideas. They may delve into questions of meaning and value from various angles, such as philosophy, ethics, social justice, language, communication, or personal growth. Their ideas may emphasize the importance of individual and collective well-being, the pursuit of knowledge and understanding, and the appreciation of diverse perspectives.
On the other hand, Jordan Peterson Compatible Thinkers share some common ground with Peterson’s ideas, such as the exploration of archetypal psychology, hierarchies, and the balance between order and chaos. They may emphasize the importance of personal responsibility, self-actualization, and the pursuit of meaning in the face of life’s challenges. These thinkers may offer tools, insights, or frameworks that help individuals navigate their lives, develop resilience, and strive for self-improvement.
While both groups of thinkers address the concepts of meaning and value, they do so from different vantage points and with varying emphasis on certain aspects. The ideas of the two groups can be seen as complementary, offering a richer understanding of the human experience when considered together.
(compatibles as promised):
Alan Watts Mythology and Religion
Joseph Campbell Mythology and Religion
Karen Armstrong Mythology and Religion
Erich Fromm Psychoanalysis
Abraham Maslow Psychology
Albert Ellis Psychology
Carl Rogers Psychology
Elaine Aron Psychology
Erik Erikson Psychology
Lev Vygotsky Psychology
