what an interesting dive i did.
I like to look for the authors and publication to see if there’s a guiding philosophy behind them
The publication is from a billionaire’s think tank – the berggreun institute
they do a lot of philanthropy and are somewhat vague
There’s a lot of mention of “fostering toes between West and China” along with a lot of rationalist style humanism.
Peter singer won this year’s award for his work with animal
ethics and as a public philosopher to give a sense.
they seem to be of the “kind economic hierarchy” model – The wealthy are allowed to keep making their money so long as they don’t take all of it and are generous to non wealthy people
I also noticed the vagueness towards the end, and I didn’t fully agree with the portrayal of block chain and AI as two sides of a single coin, yet it is an interesting perspective.
interdependence is both a magic word and a weasel word depending
I have seen it used a status quo enforcer, much as any “we have to with together” may.
I can’t even say that I am against it as I’ve always leaned strongly towards globalist.
but Inani Schroedinger ‘s caution and criticism with the article is warranted, even if I myself don’t particularly mind the corporate vagueness
definitely look to the backgrounds here to understand better.
I don’t think i mind their goals, although I think they ultimately fall short of a full human rights perspective.
but for a tool of the wealthy and powerful, this is probably about as close as they can get from amongst themselves