Well, you get groups of 3 then as a natural unit. 3 3 3 Bundling 3 3’s you get 9.

Well, you get groups of 3 then as a natural unit.
3
3
3
Bundling 3 3’s you get 9.
 I don’t know. It’s a hypothetical situation where the placeholding function is distinct from the numerosity and not put together. I don’t know how you’d count from 1 to 20 but I’m curious.
 One could possible round down to 9 or up to the elevated 1 in the next level?
 Not really. Wandering thoughts. I think I want to look at magnitude as well, to see how natural ratios may fit in. Log maybe, I dunno.Like, how when we’re looking at large amounts of objects, we’re able to gauge that 100 is twice of 50 better than 55 is greater than 50.
===
 I’m back at Zipf’s law. I did not expect to end up back here but I should have known.
Log scale.
 
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/320/5880/1217.abstract
 
REPORT
Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures
===

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ eight = 10

Leave a Reply