# Using only changings and nothing else, how do you create a universe?

Using only changings and nothing else, how do you create a universe?

—-

c r e a t e

that means: creating time, space, energy, matter and all you have to work with is changings.

—-

neutron + proton ain’t a thing yet. Not even a yet. No time… yet.

=====

diagonalize the manifold
So, manifold is infinite?

——

square root of infinity is still… an infinity. Although… along the fold.. hmmm
=====
If you’re going from the eternal never-changing Platonic realm to a spacetime Universe as we seem to be a part of……change is what starts when.
=====
However you want to go about the process of process.
======
Yup. Good bedtime stories though. 21st century needs better religions and this is as good as any.
======
It’s all hiding over in that warehouse storage universe over yonder.
——
the continuous (space/time) vs discrete (numerosity, Turing calculations) dichotomy thing.
======
y’all so dumb.
just need differentiatings.

differentiatings differentiating differentiatings
======
Or…maybe sameness differentiating differentiatings.

Or differentiatings differentiating sameness
======
====
maybe just need differentiatings.
differentiatings differentiating differentiatings
Or…maybe sameness differentiating differentiatings.
Or differentiatings differentiating sameness
======
I was thinking more of an “ew” push away from itself but that works.
=====
thinking of an “ew” push away from itself.

======

Yes but oscillation is change. Time is change Space over time affords change (movement)
====
A change in space necessitates a change in time for time is change.
=====
Fluctuation: “an irregular rising and falling in number or amount; a variation.”As soon as you have variation, you have a before and a now.
======
I don’t know. As far as I can figure out, ANY change of any kind is time itself, however we might try to turn it into a hypothetical sheet, a manifold, or do a slice.It’s still change. No change? Time didn’t pass. No time. Doesn’t exist – or might as well not exist.
=====
We can represent. But it takes time to draw that line or to do that calculation.
=====
Ok – so that’s an “it is what it is” argument. Or, “it’s only a problem because you said, ‘This is a problem” and it’s not really a problem as long as you don’t say it’s a problem.So, it’s kind of evasive, I think. But it’s a darn powerful evasion.
======
I’m not saying it’s a fallacy – I don’t know if it is or not. But that took me a whole minute to formulate a response. It was hard to find a ‘chink’ in that armor.
=====
I have a sadly thin knowledge of philosophers but I’m always working on it. But knowing that you’re taking a subjective position does help, yes.
=====
Ok. Birth, life, death. We experience life but our birth is beyond our capacity and death is also.

But we think we know of birth and death from what we witness and usually apply it to ourselves.

=======