Types. Information is connections between. Information is usually segmented into types. In 2013, i took the largest English thesaurus, cross referenced everything to everything to see what’s would sieve through. Ended up with 5. No idea how to describe 100,000 words in 5 categories. Published it in 2014 with a tenuous notion of 5 distinctions but I wasn’t happy with it. I called it dimensions. But I think I got it now. It’s types. 1: Binary (wholes) 2: yin-yang like (entangled dual) 3: Probabilities/uncertainties/erratic 4: Descriptions of portions of systems 5: The description of the space that remains after a systemic feature is removed. I’ll go through my thesaurus and spot check to see if it holds. This is a theory to explain and I have no way of fixing any certainty that it’s correct. But it “feels right” and after sitting on it for 5 years doing nothing else with it maybe it’s time I put something forward.

Types. Information is connections between. Information is usually segmented into types.

In 2013, i took the largest English thesaurus, cross referenced everything to everything to see what’s would sieve through.

Ended up with 5. No idea how to describe 100,000 words in 5 categories.

Published it in 2014 with a tenuous notion of 5 distinctions but I wasn’t happy with it. I called it dimensions.

But I think I got it now. It’s types.

1: Binary (wholes)
2: yin-yang like (entangled dual)
3: Probabilities/uncertainties/erratic
4: Descriptions of portions of systems
5: The description of the space that remains after a systemic feature is removed.

I’ll go through my thesaurus and spot check to see if it holds.

This is a theory to explain and I have no way of fixing any certainty that it’s correct.

But it “feels right” and after sitting on it for 5 years doing nothing else with it maybe it’s time I put something forward.

====

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


5 + = nine

Leave a Reply