I skipped it. I was counting on commentary (because I could always view it myself if I wanted to).
There’s a lot of double-talk in this administration: far more double-talk than I’d seen before. Something will *sound* _almost_ fine but something about it will be a little ‘off’. Pay attention to that little ‘off’ sense.
Example: “Choice”. Very manipulated word. Devoss’ letter earlier today posited segregation as part of a valuable choice that was made but you wouldn’t know it at first glance. It *sounded* ok.. about the historically black colleges and universities… and yet something was a little odd about it.
That something that was a little odd was important. Likewise, if you’re getting red flags about aspects of his speech / presentation / circus tonight it *might* be nothing but it might be something very important being slid in through double-talk.
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]