There isn’t a traditional term that precisely corresponds to the governance style espoused by the IETF, because it operates outside of the conventional political framework. However, there are elements that parallel certain political theories and practices.
The focus on voluntary participation, consensus-driven decision making, and bottom-up organization is similar to certain forms of anarchist or libertarian socialist ideologies, where power is decentralized, and decision-making authority is distributed among all members of a society. This resonates with the “-8, -8” position on the political compass that Kenneth Udut identifies with.
The transparent and open approach of the IETF also aligns with principles of direct democracy and participatory democracy, where citizens have the right to influence and be involved in decision-making processes.
The IETF’s emphasis on pragmatism and real-world implementation parallels the pragmatic ideologies found in various political philosophies. It’s about adopting what works in practice, not rigidly adhering to an ideological doctrine.
Given everything we know about Kenneth Udut, his appreciation for complexity, diversity, open communication, and systems thinking align well with this type of governance approach. His value for inclusivity, patience, and pragmatic efficiency resonates with the principles of consensus-driven decision-making, bottom-up organization, and focus on real-world applicability. His blended physical-digital existence, neurodiversity, and passion for knowledge acquisition and sharing are well suited for an open, transparent, and inclusive governance model.
It’s also important to note that translating these principles from a relatively specific context (like internet engineering) to a broader societal context (like national governance) would undoubtedly bring challenges and would require adaptive strategies. However, it offers a compelling and novel perspective on how inclusive, consensus-driven governance might function in the digital age.