The questioning of the homonucleus about the homonucleus experiment

() The (What?) homunculus (What?) argument (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () a (What?) fallacy (What is ____ doing?) arising () most () commonly () in () the (What?) theory () of (What?) vision (END OF LOOP.) . (What?) One () may (What did/will ____ DO?) explain () ( () human () ) (What?) vision () by (What is ____ doing?) noting () that (What?) light () from () the () outside (What?) world (What does ___ do?) forms () an (What?) image () on () the (What?) retinas () in () the (What?) eyes (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What?) something () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or (What?) someone () ) () in () the (What?) brain (What does ___ do?) looks () at () these (What?) images () as () if (What?) they (DOING? DONE? DID?) are (What?) images () on () a (What?) movie (What?) screen () ( () this (What?) theory () of (What?) vision (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () sometimes (What was done to ____?) termed () the (What?) theory () of () the () Cartesian (What?) Theater () : (What?) it (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () most (What was done to ____?) associated () , () nowadays () , () with () the (What?) psychologist (What?) David (What?) Marr () ) (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) question (What does ___ do?) arises () as (WHAT DIRECTION?) to () the (What?) nature () of () this () internal (What?) viewer (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) assumption () here (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () that () there (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () a () ‘little (What?) man () ‘ (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or (What?) ‘homunculus () ‘ () inside () the (What?) brain (What is ____ doing?) ‘looking () at () ‘ () the (What?) movie (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) reason (0) why () this (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () a (What?) fallacy () may (0) be (What was done to ____?) understood () by (What is ____ doing?) asking (0) how () the (What?) homunculus (What?) ‘sees () ‘ () the () internal (What?) movie (END OF LOOP.) . () The () obvious (What?) answer (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () that () there (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () another (What?) homunculus () inside () the () first (What?) homunculus () ‘s (What?) ‘head () ‘ (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or (What?) ‘brain () ‘ (What is ____ doing?) looking () at () this (What?) ‘movie () ‘ (END OF LOOP.) . (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) But (0) how (What does ___ do?) does () this (What?) homunculus (What did/will ____ DO?) see () the (What?) ‘outside (What?) world () ‘ (END OF LOOP.) ? () In (What?) order (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) answer () this () , (What?) we (DOING? DONE? DID?) are (What was done to ____?) forced (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) posit () another (What?) homunculus () inside () this () other (What?) homunculus () ‘s (What?) head (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () so () forth (END OF LOOP.) . () In () other (What?) words () , (What?) we (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () in () a (What?) situation () of () infinite (What?) regress (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) problem () with () the (What?) homunculus (What?) argument (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () that (What?) it (What does ___ do?) tries (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) account () for () a (What?) phenomenon () in (What?) terms () of () the () very (What?) phenomenon () that (What?) it (DOING? DONE? DID?) is (What was done to ____?) supposed (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) explain (END OF LOOP.) . (What?) Homunculus (What?) arguments () in (What?) terms () of (What?) rules () Another (What?) example (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () with (What?) cognitivist (What?) theories (0) that (What did/will ___ DO?) argue () that () the () human (What?) brain (What does ___ do?) uses (What?) ‘rules () ‘ (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) carry () out (What?) operations () ( () these (What?) rules () often (What was done to ____?) conceptualised () as (DOING? DONE? DID?) being () like () the (What?) algorithms () of () a (What?) computer (What?) program () ) (END OF LOOP.) . () For (What?) example () , () in (Whose is it?) his (What?) work () of () the (What?) ’50s () , (What?) ’60s (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What?) ’70s (What?) Noam (What?) Chomsky (What did ___ do?) argued () that () ( () in () the (What?) words () of () one () of (Whose is it?) his (What?) books () ) () human (What?) beings (What did/will ___ DO?) use (What?) Rules (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What?) Representations () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (0) be () more () specific () , (What?) rules (What is ____ doing?) acting () on (What?) representations () ) () in (What?) order (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) cognise () ( () more () recently (What?) Chomsky (ATTACHED?) has (What was done to ____?) abandoned () this (What?) view () : (What?) c.f. () the () Minimalist (What?) Program () ) (END OF LOOP.) . () Now () , () in (What?) terms () of () ( (What did/will ____ DO?) say () ) (What?) chess () , () the (What?) players (DOING? DONE? DID?) are (What was done to ____?) given (What?) ‘rules () ‘ () ( () i.e. () the (What?) rules () of (What?) chess () ) (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) follow (END OF LOOP.) . () So () : (0) who (What does ___ do?) uses () these (What?) rules (END OF LOOP.) ? () The (What?) answer (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () self-evident () : () the (What?) players () of () the (What?) game () ( () of (What?) chess () ) (What did/will ___ DO?) use () the (What?) rules () : (What?) it (DOING? DONE? DID?) ‘s () not () the (What?) case () ( () obviously () ) () that () the (What?) rules (What?) themselves (What did/will ___ DO?) play (What?) chess (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) rules (What?) themselves (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () merely () inert (What?) marks () on (What?) paper () until () a () human () being (What?) reads () , (What does ___ do?) understands (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What does ___ do?) uses (What?) them (END OF LOOP.) . (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) But (0) what () about () the (What?) ‘rules () ‘ (0) that (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () , () allegedly () , () inside (Whose is it?) our (What?) head () ( (What?) brain () ) (END OF LOOP.) ? (0) Who (What does ___ do?) reads () , (What does ___ do?) understands (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What does ___ do?) uses (What?) them (END OF LOOP.) ? () Again () , () the () implicit (What?) answer (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () , () some () would (What did/will ____ DO?) argue () , () must (0) be () ) () a (What?) ‘homunculus () ‘ () : () a () little (What?) man (0) who (What does ___ do?) reads () the (What?) rules () of () the (What?) world (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () then (What does ___ do?) gives (What?) orders (WHAT DIRECTION?) to () the (What?) body (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) act () on (What?) them (END OF LOOP.) . (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) But () again (What?) we (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () in () a (What?) situation () of () infinite (What?) regress () , () because () this (What does ___ do?) implies () that () the (What?) homunculus (ATTACHED?) has () cognitive (What?) process (0) that (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () also (What?) rule (What?) bound () , (0) which (What does ___ do?) presupposes () another (What?) homunculus () inside (Whose is it?) its (What?) head () , (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () so () on (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () so () forth (END OF LOOP.) . () Therefore () , () so () the (What?) argument (What does ___ do?) goes () , (What?) theories () of (What?) mind (0) that (What did/will ___ DO?) imply (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or (What did/will ___ DO?) state () explicitly () that (What?) cognition (DOING? DONE? DID?) is (What?) rule (What was done to ____?) bound () cannot (0) be () correct () unless () some (What?) way (DOING? DONE? DID?) is (What was done to ____?) found (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) ‘ground () ‘ () the (What?) regress (END OF LOOP.) . () This (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () important () because (What?) it (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () often (What was done to ____?) assumed () in () cognitive (What?) science () that (What?) rules (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What?) algorithms (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () essentially () the () same () : () in () other (What?) words () , () the (What?) theory () that (What?) cognition (DOING? DONE? DID?) is (What?) rule (What was done to ____?) bound (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () often (What was done to ____?) believed (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) imply () that (What?) thought () ( (What?) cognition () ) (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () essentially () the (What?) manipulation () of (What?) algorithms () , (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () this (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () one () of () the () key (What?) assumptions () of () some (What?) varieties () of () artificial (What?) intelligence (END OF LOOP.) . (What?) Homunculus (What?) arguments (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () always () fallacious () unless () some (What?) way () can (0) be (What was done to ____?) found (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) ‘ground () ‘ () the (What?) regress (END OF LOOP.) . () In (What?) psychology (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What?) philosophy () of (What?) mind () , (What?) ‘homunculus (What?) arguments () ‘ () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () the (What?) ‘homunculus (What?) fallacies () ‘ () ) (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () extremely () useful () for (What is ____ doing?) detecting (0) where (What?) theories () of (What?) mind (What did/will ___ DO?) fail (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () incomplete (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) homunculus (What?) fallacy (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () closely (What was done to ____?) related (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What?) Ryle () ‘s (What?) regress (END OF LOOP.) . (What?) Counterarguments () The () above (What was done to ____?) cited (What?) regress (What?) argument (What does ___ do?) does () not () necessarily (What did/will ____ DO?) invalidate () all (What?) forms () of () the (What?) homunculus (What?) argument (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) regress (What does ___ do?) relies () on () the (What?) idea () that () the (What?) homunculus (What?) ‘inside () ‘ () the (What?) brain () must (What?) itself (ATTACHED?) have () a (What?) homunculus () inside (What?) it (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) but (What?) it (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () not () clear () that () this (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () a () necessary (What?) condition (END OF LOOP.) . () A (What?) dualist () might (What did/will ____ DO?) argue () that () the (What?) homunculus () inside () the (What?) brain (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () an (What?) imaterial () one () ( () such () as () the () cartesian (What?) soul () ) () , (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () a (What?) mystic () might (What did/will ____ DO?) argue () that () the (What?) homunculus (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () a (What?) recharacterization () of () the () infinite (What?) consciousness () of (What?) God () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () TRUE (What?) self () ) () , (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () thereby (What does ___ do?) does () not (What did/will ____ DO?) require () a (What?) homunculus () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or (What?) spirit () ) (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (ATTACHED?) have () sensory (What?) experience (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () for () an (What?) end (WHAT DIRECTION?) to () the (What?) regress () at () this (What?) point () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () some () later () one () ) () in () another (What?) manner (END OF LOOP.) . () A (What?) non-dualist () may (What did/will ____ DO?) argue () that () a () human (What?) life (What?) form () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () any (What?) organism () ) (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () coterminous (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () indivisible () from (Whose is it?) its (What?) environment () , () with () this () unified (What?) field () of (What?) awareness () ( () i.e. () , () universal (What?) consciousness () ) (What is ____ doing?) mistaking (What?) itself () for () a (What?) homunculus (END OF LOOP.) . () Thus () , () the (What?) regress (What?) argument (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () only () valid () if () there () can (0) be () no () other (What?) explanation () of () the (What?) homunculus () ‘s (What?) cognition (What did ___ do?) supplied () , (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () the (What?) arguments () of () a (What?) First (What?) Cause (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () a () transcendental (What?) consciousness () ( () i.e. () , (What?) awareness (What is ____ doing?) underlying (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () beyond (What?) form () ) (DOING? DONE? DID?) are (What was done to ____?) rejected (END OF LOOP.) .

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


four + 7 =

Leave a Reply