There we be. Latest from psychology *finally* has our “mental models” of truth/belief/false/etc (reasoning) as a dynamic process, iterating continuously rather than discrete [although one could ‘digitize’ continuous change, although that might lead to errors in accuracy, even if ultra precise]
10 LET X = SOMETHING
20: f : X → X
30 GOTO 20
If X=1, then X keeps staying 1.
If x is a set of rules or something, then it gets interesting.
A set of rules applied to a set of rules which applies the set of rules to the set of rules continuously across time?
You’re probably going to get change.
The more interesting X gets, the more interesting things get over time.
Dynamic systems. In psychology it means we continually update our mental models over time.
[it gets more detailed than that but that’s the ‘gist’ of it]
