the main drawback to ontological plurism that i can see is that it embeds the notion of Types (or kinds or whatever you want to call it). that is, there simply are going to be irreconcilable things, and overlapping definitions that share territories without further separation, etc and the like. its not a full satisfaction as one might get if they believe that the universe is math or logic or is illusion or some mono equally spaced exchangeable unit of measure. but it frees up a lot of time.

the main drawback to ontological plurism that i can see is that it embeds the notion of Types (or kinds or whatever you want to call it).

that is, there simply are going to be irreconcilable things, and overlapping definitions that share territories without further separation, etc and the like.

its not a full satisfaction as one might get if they believe that the universe is math or logic or is illusion or some mono equally spaced exchangeable unit of measure.

but it frees up a lot of time.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× 5 = fifteen

Leave a Reply