The court case is finished so I’m not arguing that. A ruling, whatever it is, is the ruling and that’s that.
Future events, future parents who want their children to be future Kyle Rittenhouses is my concern.
Those parents now have a template to follow for THEIR kids about children, how the system may function in a similar situation, and what options they have for their children to be heroes for their causes.
It won’t be the same. But they’ll think it is.
-
Like
—
I happen to like America. Vigilantism is dangerous, however just it may be found in court after the fact.
-
Like
==
He’s a vigilante who was found not guilty of murder by a jury of his peers after taking the law into his own hands by reason of self-defense.
-
LikeThe case emboldens future vigilantes in their dreams. The new American precedent is set. I remember it after zimmerman in FL and what it did with Castle Doctrine and even if the Rittenhouse case is NOT a castle doctrine law, governors will use it as one to ensure they get votes by their preferred group of voters.Is what it is. Such is America.==The case emboldens future vigilantes in their dreams. The new American precedent is set. I remember it after zimmerman in FL and what it did with Castle Doctrine and even if the Rittenhouse case is NOT a castle doctrine law, governors will use it as one to ensure they get votes by their preferred group of voters.Is what it is. Such is America.===