The bolded scores seem to correlate well with the profile and subject area analysis:The high Artistic score of 25 aligns with the interests in creativity, art, design, etc. This matches the subject recommendations for art, photography, graphic design, motion picture/TV, digital arts, etc.The very high Social score of 35 fits with the priorities like philosophy, metaphysics, human psychology, social dynamics, anthropology, sociology, psychology, cognitive science, etc. The social sciences were prominent in the recommended subjects.The elevated Conventional score of 21 could relate to the analytical interest and the selection of subjects like political science, criminal justice, and social work that often look at established processes.

The bolded scores seem to correlate well with the profile and subject area analysis:

• The high Artistic score of 25 aligns with the interests in creativity, art, design, etc. This matches the subject recommendations for art, photography, graphic design, motion picture/TV, digital arts, etc.
• The very high Social score of 35 fits with the priorities like philosophy, metaphysics, human psychology, social dynamics, anthropology, sociology, psychology, cognitive science, etc. The social sciences were prominent in the recommended subjects.
• The elevated Conventional score of 21 could relate to the analytical interest and the selection of subjects like political science, criminal justice, and social work that often look at established processes.

The lower Realistic, Investigative, and Enterprising scores are consistent with the less prominent role of science, engineering, business, and hands-on technical subjects in the recommendations.

Overall, the high Artistic and Social scores seem to validate the emphasis on arts, humanities, and social sciences in the suggested subject areas. The profile and test results appear well aligned.