Yes – in other words – they may believe – and even get the world to believe them as objective truths but the reason they’re not universally agreed upon is because – as comprehensive as many of these systems are, they are, ultimately, a perspective – no matter HOW thorough. I’m thinking of even the big things like mathematics + things that are widely useful in describing reality. Yet there are always gaps that are better filled in by other things. I’m trying to identify the sources of those blind spots.
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]