That’s right. In that case, the establishment would be people also in the establishment that you don’t care for, so you position yourself as if you are an outsider (when you’re not) and convince people outside that you’re one of them. That gives political leverage against your internal enemies
Well, it’s in the name in a way. Ideals. Ideology. I think each ideology likely has a notion that “if things were done this way, things would improve than from where they are currently”.
Oh for sure. He made it acceptable. It was there already; Newt Gingrich set the stage in the 1980s with his recommendation to new Republican congressmen to read a particular book on animal behavior and how to be that kind of aggressive — the Pat Robertson talk and Rush Limbaugh in the 90s – the rise of nationalism in the early to mid 00s worldwide, and by the time Trump came along, the soil was ready to receive him
In the US, politicians are usually tolerated. Some are fanatical about their favorites but most people are not fanatical about politicians. Most people don’t want to be LED – they want LICENSE to do what they want and power to punish those that don’t do what they want
politics is not limited to geographical people/ land management