(That which is left/remainder) is a type of [Wholeness]. [[Mutual relation of parts to whole]] is like (That which is left/remainder).

(Attachment) is a type of [Mutual relation of parts to whole]. [[Fastening]] is like (Attachment).

(Condition of being fast bound/firmly fixed) is a type of [Fastening]. [[Separation]] is like (Condition of being fast bound/firmly fixed).

(Hold/holding) is a type of [Absence of movement]. [[Action/operation]] is like (Hold/holding).

====

What’s interesting is what DIDN’T show in the last frame.

What’s after “Action/operation?”

(Acting in another’s business/intervention) is a type of [Action/operation]. [[Undertaking]] is like (Acting in another’s business/intervention).

That is: ACTIVISM.

What came before “Wholeness”?

(Decrease/reduction in quantity/amount/degree) is a type of [Smallness of quantity/amount/degree]. [[Wholeness]] is like (Decrease/reduction in quantity/amount/degree).

Prior to “Smallness in quantity/amount/degree” is:

(Increase by addition) is a type of [Increase in quantity/amount/degree]. [[Smallness of quantity/amount/degree]] is like (Increase by addition).

Prior to: “Increase in quantity/amount/degree” is:

(Excessive amount/degree) is a type of [Sufficient quantity/amount/degree]. [[Increase in quantity/amount/degree]] is like (Excessive amount/degree).

It’s takes a little visualization to ‘see’ how it connects logically but it’s logical semantic connections.

=====

In short, the delicate process of boundary-making.

—–

How do you get to Sufficient Quantity/Amount/Degree?

322: (High/intense degree) is a type of [Quantity]. [[Sufficient quantity/amount/degree]] is like (High/intense degree).

AHH — furthest semantically related but still within the category of QUANTITY is “High/intense degree”.

(Equipment for weighing) is a type of [Measuring instrument]. [[Quantity]] is like (Equipment for weighing).

Ok, backwards to Measuring instrument…

(Amount defined by capacity) is a type of [Measurement]. [[Measuring instrument]] is like (Amount defined by capacity).

So: Measurement. What’s prior to Measurement?

(Data) is a type of [Software]. [[Measurement]] is like (Data).

SOFTWARE??

(Computer) is a type of [Graph/diagram]. [[Software]] is like (Computer).

“Graph/Diagram”

(Shape/figure) is a type of [Mathematical notation/symbol]. [[Graph/diagram]] is like (Shape/figure).

“Mathematical notation/symbol”

(Numerical arrangement) is a type of [Mathematics]. [[Mathematical notation/symbol]] is like (Numerical arrangement).

“Mathematics”.

(Great number, numerousness) is a type of [Plurality]. [[Mathematics]] is like (Great number, numerousness).

“Plurality”.

(Hundred and over) is a type of [Three]. [[Plurality]] is like (Hundred and over).

“THREE” – I knew it – haha – Joshua Church Boylan lookie

(Division into two) is a type of [Two]. [[Three]] is like (Division into two).

Ah of course because dividing into two implies 3 (the two separate parts PLUS the action of separation = 3 or a tuple.

(Firstness) is a type of [Number]. [[Two]] is like (Firstness).

(Discontinuity/interrupted sequence/condition) is a type of [Order/sequence/succession]. [[Number]] is like (Discontinuity/interrupted sequence/condition).

“Order/sequence/succession” ok cool.

(Unsuitability/inappropriateness) is a type of [Disharmony/incongruity]. [[Order/sequence/succession]] is like (Unsuitability/inappropriateness).

ooh surprising yet logical. “Disharmony/incongruity”.

(Unconformity) is a type of [Irregularity

=====

I need to flip this and present it in a way normal folks think. Maybe large font for parent concept and small font for child concept going in a linear direction downwards rather than upwards. Nah I like it like this

====