Thanks for the tag here. I’d seen his face and heard about him but always though “eh, crackpot” but despite my distaste for his politics, he’s definitely created a defensible system that is coherent to itself.

Thanks for the tag here. I’d seen his face and heard about him but always though “eh, crackpot” but despite my distaste for his politics, he’s definitely created a defensible system that is coherent to itself.
  • Like
Oh they don’t just stink a little.. he’s like a high-IQ Mr. Alt-Right.
Yuck in that territory.
Well, barring his woeful political stances, his theory of everything that I’ve seen isn’t bad. Very structured on words.
The God-is-everything-everything-is-God is pantheist, which from his point of view seems to make sense as I noticed a theme of COHERENCE. For him Evil is INCOHERENT.
I think his stance is:
Participating in reality is
participating in God is
becoming God is
being God,
and if it’s not part of God, it’s evil.
I couldn’t hold to that stance. I could do panentheism but not pantheism as with pantheism there’s no room for anything else really.
I mean, where’s his evil going to be hiding at?
===
I’m skipping around. He definitely builds everything upon words and their definitions.
He does a common thing which is expanding a level or two up in a hierarchy in order to encompass whatever the missing parts are from the thing below, in this case, building them up with words and their definitions.
Words are definitely his realm.
===

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ one = 8

Leave a Reply