Thanks for the tag here. I’d seen his face and heard about him but always though “eh, crackpot” but despite my distaste for his politics, he’s definitely created a defensible system that is coherent to itself.
Oh they don’t just stink a little.. he’s like a high-IQ Mr. Alt-Right.
Yuck in that territory.
Well, barring his woeful political stances, his theory of everything that I’ve seen isn’t bad. Very structured on words.
The God-is-everything-everything-is-God is pantheist, which from his point of view seems to make sense as I noticed a theme of COHERENCE. For him Evil is INCOHERENT.
I think his stance is:
Participating in reality is
participating in God is
becoming God is
and if it’s not part of God, it’s evil.
I couldn’t hold to that stance. I could do panentheism but not pantheism as with pantheism there’s no room for anything else really.
I mean, where’s his evil going to be hiding at?
I’m skipping around. He definitely builds everything upon words and their definitions.
He does a common thing which is expanding a level or two up in a hierarchy in order to encompass whatever the missing parts are from the thing below, in this case, building them up with words and their definitions.
Words are definitely his realm.