Many countries figure out your natural aptitudes and from there you go to college/vocational schools, all part of citizenship. In some countries it works well, like Finland. In Egypt, at least in the 80s, it sometimes worked / sometimes was a mismatch. [my mother’s ex-husband’s brother was trained to be a lawyer in Egypt but he hated it, even though he was good at it and had a cousin trained to be a cop (they train police over there unlike some countries and interestingly have different types like traffic cop which nobody takes seriously, on up, rather than “one cop for all things”). And in both – Finland and Egypt, higher education is paid for. In the USA, we have very expensive schools like Yale. My governor of Florida, Rhonda Sanchez went to Yale. It got him politically where he needed to go. But as an actual education, it was worthless.

Many countries figure out
[read full article]
 

Learning: documenting map here. Already had interest in play-as-formative; looked up error correction in the brain, unexpectedly found a graphic about egocentric vs allocentric in map forming in the mind, which was influenced by: Donald Winnicott who was a middle-of-the-road between traditional british psychoanalysis (freud) and a more radical: Ronald Fairbairn who they would not teach for many years because he was so anti-Freud. HOWEVER, he had some who did, one of whom was John Sutherland who had several students, one of which was JD Laing who had a radically different view of mental illness – that it can be sometimes positively transformative – like religious experience – and itself modify behavior in a more natural way. So now I have a road map of this mornings surprise research – and lines to draw from to find parallels and maybe link to things I’d already read long ago to see what schools of thought I already belong to and don’t realize it.

Learning: documenting map here.
[read full article]
 

Muscle pattern training compensates [this relates to the ADHD-like symptoms in preterm] YES! Motor skills FULLY MEDIATED the association between preterm birth and P300 but not cardiovascular training. That is: LEARN MUSCLE SKILLS (like playing the piano, drawing, sports). (Now what about P300 _initiation_ > response?) “Very preterm birth was associated with impaired response inhibition.” • Impaired behavioral performance was linked with decreased P300, but not N200. • Motor skills fully mediated the association of preterm birth and P300. • Cardiorespiratory fitness did not contribute to this mediation. • Improving motor skills might promise the reduction of cognitive control deficits. N200-P300 complex. Doesn’t differentiate between subtypes (ADHD vs inattentive ADHD _however_ as this isn’t about “which ADHD is more similar to very preterm/vlbw symptoms? (ADHD-I) but about preterm. The “Go” of P300 internally generated intent has issues too in preterm > adhd or adhd-i – I’ll see who else does. But this study right here is big; it confirms motor compensation for inhibition issues]

Muscle pattern training compensates
[read full article]
 

[this relates to the ADHD-like symptoms in preterm] YES! Motor skills FULLY MEDIATED the association between preterm birth and P300 but not cardiovascular training. That is: LEARN MUSCLE SKILLS (like playing the piano, drawing, sports). (Now what about P300 _initiation_ > response?) “Very preterm birth was associated with impaired response inhibition.” • Impaired behavioral performance was linked with decreased P300, but not N200. • Motor skills fully mediated the association of preterm birth and P300. • Cardiorespiratory fitness did not contribute to this mediation. • Improving motor skills might promise the reduction of cognitive control deficits. N200-P300 complex. Doesn’t differentiate between subtypes (ADHD vs inattentive ADHD _however_ as this isn’t about “which ADHD is more similar to very preterm/vlbw symptoms? (ADHD-I) but about preterm. The “Go” of P300 internally generated intent has issues too in preterm > adhd or adhd-i – I’ll see who else does. But this study right here is big; it confirms motor compensation for inhibition issues] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929321000475

[this relates to the
[read full article]
 

No, it’s a self-reprimand I’d generally keep in my head but I wrote it out because it too is worthy of scrutiny. I have strong opinions about the present and future of humanity that strongly lean towards shifting and changing a few things. But I hold more value towards these awkward online friendships as they’re so damned transient and fleeting and damn if I didn’t didn’t let a few of my strong opinions get in the way; each of my opinions has a level of importance value; while I’m talking about it I put my all in but my actual level of importance IN GENERAL is _usually_ far far far lower on the scale of “important things”. the message isn’t in the debate points nor even the debating styles presented but in the passionate communication process itself between people of good will.

No, it’s a self-reprimand
[read full article]
 

EDIT 5: I was right the first time; removed the doubt edits. Confusion was that SOCIAL is can also be included in DMN but doesn’t have to be. will add: start at DMN, THEN to motor, then using motor/concrete to imitate a “2nd order DMN” that includes social background assumption (typical social intentions) due to lack of a DMN social background .. oh, i am so close. –restart Motor to default mode network There is a how to why spectrum which goes from concrete to abstract and it recruits different parts of the brain but it’s not so much a dichotomy as there’s levels of abstraction. This is big. I’ve read some people (inattentive adhd, autism, preterm born but there’s many others) who spend a lot of time in the “default mode network” (DFN) (daydreaming, thinking about past and future and possibilities, etc) and I’m definitely one of them. Now armed with that and a) the notion of an “salience network” bridging between default mode network and executive network (a paper from a few days ago and b) this notion of concrete (how) to abstract (why / social), I’m “almost there”. These papers use DIFFERENT notion of abstract than I’ve been and so I have to adjust so I’m not there “yet” but wow it’s almost: I think for example my learning of psychology from a young age was to compensate for being UNABLE to form a quick “Theory of Mind” and _instead” have used reasoning systems to compensate and motor systems for “SPEED” to try to IMITATE A “THEORY OF MIND” (compensation) as best I could.

EDIT 5: I was
[read full article]
 

it is digital in the sense of steps but then we have to be careful not to mistake digital and sampling rate; the very notion of “rate” comes FROM a “smooth reality” assumption; this notion that we can break up a smooth continuum into evenly spaced, evenly sized discrete steps, convenient because that happens to be oscillations which are modeled on hypothetical circles; and so when we are at DIGITAL we end up back at continuous because of our mathematical tools which are based on continuous reality assumptions from Newton’s time.

it is digital in … [read full article]

 

I think what’s been strange to me as I’m going through all of this (I started seriously looking at this back in April 2013) is I would get hints and bits and pieces. I would see these mechanisms in artificial intelligence Then at a different point, I would see it in an old neurological model from the late 1940s. But then I would see Echoes of it in newer cogsci work And then I would see things about cybernetics and others about computing Then I would read things about process oriented philosophies Then things about physicalism And of course physics which is my main thing – but I’d be learning about mathematics and trying to understand the origins of infinitesimal calculus Then later stuff from intuitionistic mathematics All the while comparing and contrasting with my own thought processes But my continual critiquing of modeling kept getting in the way And I’d be side tracked looking at diverse models to see what “felt right” always using my intuition as a guide But bringing it together has been a whole other thing. I think it’s because I was resisting and testing cybernetic principles (for lack of a better central notion) from many different perspectives – probably. I didn’t have a master plan nor a master question.

I think what’s been
[read full article]