100 People “Wikipedia-Mentioned” People are most influenced By ——– (I’m FINALLY learning how to use dbpedia’s Wikipedia query a little. Found a field “influencedBy”, I then did a count, so I made this) Ken 256 Immanuel Kant 250 Karl Marx 212 Aristotle 180 Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel 166 Plato 150 Martin Heidegger 148 Friedrich Nietzsche 98 Ludwig Wittgenstein 94 Sigmund Freud 86 John Maynard Keynes 86 Thomas Aquinas 80 Edmund Husserl 69 Charles Darwin 69 Baruch Spinoza 68 Michel Foucault 67 René Descartes 66 Augustine of Hippo 66 David Hume 64 Jean-Jacques Rousseau 60 John Locke 57 Søren Kierkegaard 57 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 56 Adam Smith 54 Friedrich Hayek 51 Jacques Derrida 48 Arthur Schopenhauer 47 Bertrand Russell 47 Gilles Deleuze 47 John Stuart Mill 46 William James 45 Henri Bergson 45 Max Weber 44 Jean-Paul Sartre 43 John Rawls 42 Ludwig von Mises 42 Socrates 42 John Dewey 40 Charles Sanders Peirce 36 Maurice Merleau-Ponty 35 Thomas Hobbes 34 Milton Friedman 33 Jacques Lacan 33 Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling 32 Johann Gottlieb Fichte 31 Johann Wolfgang von Goethe 31 Gottlob Frege 29 Alfred North Whitehead 28 Karl Popper 28 Friedrich Engels 27 Carl Jung 26 Isaac Newton 26 Willard Van Orman Quine 26 Joseph Schumpeter 25 Émile Durkheim 25 Theodor W. Adorno 24 Auguste Comte 24 Vladimir Lenin 24 Hannah Arendt 23 Emmanuel Levinas 23 Voltaire 22 Louis Althusser 22 Herbert Spencer 22 Plotinus 22 Niccolò Machiavelli 22 Heraclitus 22 Max Stirner 21 Avicenna 21 Leo Strauss 21 Murray Rothbard 21 Blaise Pascal 20 Antonio Gramsci 20 Ayn Rand 20 Albert Einstein 19 Edmund Burke 19 György Lukács 19 Hans-Georg Gadamer 19 Jean Piaget 19 Amartya Sen 18 Alexis de Tocqueville 18 Gaston Bachelard 18 Epicurus 18 Fyodor Dostoevsky 18 Franz Brentano 18 Jürgen Habermas 17 Donald Davidson (philosopher) 17 Walter Benjamin 17 Cicero 17 Pierre-Joseph Proudhon 17 Michel de Montaigne 17 Joseph de Maistre 17 G. E. Moore 17 Wilfrid Sellars 16 Michał Kalecki 16 Montesquieu 16 Noam Chomsky 16 Rudolf Carnap 16 Carl Menger 16 Georg Simmel

100 People “Wikipedia-Mentioned” People
[read full article]

(on non-adjacent dependencies) “This outcome suggested that bracketing the sequences of stimuli as fluid transformations is critical for NAD acquisition, a process which could occur as the result of viewing actual fluid transformation (i.e. a video of continuous movement), or perceived fluid transformation (i.e. a sequence of images suggesting continuous movement). Particularly with stimuli that can be mapped onto the perceiver’s motor representation, motor sequence learning enables the representation of stimuli sequences as fluid transformations.” VIA: _Mechanisms Underlying Acquisition of Non-Adjacent Dependencies_ [IMAGE FROM A DIFFERENT PAPER: _Learning non-adjacent rules and non-adjacent dependencies from human actions in 9-month-old infants_

(on non-adjacent dependencies)
[read full article]

Wondering about saccades – I know nothing much about them; instead of looking at typical saccades, I would start with preterm saccades so I don’t waste times on things that don’t apply to me and lo and behold, this is a good result; yes, there is a difference so now I can pursue that route. Abstract Aim Eye movements have rarely been explored in preterm born children. The aim of this study was to compare horizontal eye movements in children born preterm and full term when they reached 8 years of age. Methods Eye movements were recorded in 24 preterm born children (18 boys) and 26 matched controls (19 boys), recruited by a French hospital, using an eye tracker. This identified different types of visually guided saccades, namely step, gap, overlap and antisaccades and pursuit eye movements. The saccades task measured the latency and the percentage of anticipatory and express saccades and errors. The pursuit task measured the gain and percentage of intrusive saccades. Results This study confirmed that children born at 24–28 weeks of gestation demonstrated a global deficit in inhibitory processes compared to children born full term. The saccades were less precise in the preterm group, anticipatory and express saccades were elevated and there was a high occurrence of intrusive saccades during pursuit movements. Conclusion These findings suggest that preterm born children have immature brain structures, particularly the parietal and frontal cortexes that are responsible for both saccade and pursuit performance. These could have been the cause of the abnormal inhibitory control measured in this study.

Wondering about saccades –
[read full article]

“So, to make sure I understand you correctly, you think it is impossible for a person to make a decision that avoids negative consequences of doing X , given he enjoys doing X, unless he had experienced negative consequences of using X” No. Because we were not talking about X. This is why I said you did not give a good example for X.

“So, to make sure
[read full article]

ic ok. Because there is are neural correlates to both Allocentric (object-ot-object) and egocentric (self-to-object) processing in the brain, this for me validates both “objectivist” and “subjectivist” philosophers to some degree; because they are natural to humans. This does not imply that any particular philosophy or view is ACCURATE or PRECISE; however it does mean, to me, that ANY INQUIRY that pursues objective or subjective takes _is_ a valid pursuit, regardless of its success or failure at the task. That is: it is not wrong to pursue a SUBJECTIVE philosophy; something I have often had to defend through the years; but likewise, it is not wrong to pursue an OBJECTIVE philosophy – something that _I have_ fought against through the years. This DOES NOT MEAN that cognitive science is _the way_ either; but it would be very difficult to argue that these processes DON’T have neural correlates; something is being measured that correlates to certain subjective tasks; something is being measured that correlates to certain objective tasks so there is no reason to doubt that it is normal for humans to have both an egocentric and an allocentric perspective, albeit to different degrees, with both implicit and explicit aspects – some with very little implicit yet some development is still possible via explicit learning.

Because there
[read full article]

I am reading it now and it is a pleasure. I wondered what you would have to say about play and I was not disappointed: “Behaving symbolically (Deacon 1998) as children do in pretend/imaginative play, underpins literacy learning, a 2nd order symbolic system (Vygotsky 1978, Stone and Burriss 2016). This imaginative/symbolic play arising from the PLAY system has fundamental and ongoing relevance from babyhood onwards: early word play and action play using songs, rhyme, and alliteration (Bryant et al 1990) are all practiced voluntarily by toddlers and young children as they develop a feel for the repetitions and rhythms of their languages. “

I am reading it … [read full article]