If not online, I’m
Posts tagged with '115 Time'
I live in an area with a lot of undocumented workers. Federal boots due to do a raid on our local area soon which sucks ’cause the big farms need those workers. Anyway, they always drive at or just under the speed limit. Don’t get in trouble. Stay quiet. Go to work. Spend money. Paid 75% of what US workers would get, except US workers don’t want that kind of work. So, if the big black boots from Washington DC step foot in our local soil, it’ll disrupt the fast food tomatoes and stuff. Whatever. Just another day in “States have no say” USA.
I live in an … [read full article]
I think most views of time including “it’s an illusion” to cyclical time, block universe to branching, and your really great Einsteinism axis shift could probably be mapped to each other someday much as how divergent string theories mapped when m-brane was introduced. I like your
I think most views … [read full article]
“Move Forward” is an expression. It means: Ignore This.
“Move Forward” is an … [read full article]
I use FamilySearch a lot; love the dedication to genealogy. Choir is great. There’s a new Mormon church opening up not far from me in an area with few of any churches. But… while I feel as if I could attend most services of most religions and denominations, I don’t think I could with Mormon. I respect the freedom of religion in the USA but I’ve known the difficulties of some who left and the troubles they had adjusting to their childhoods.
I use FamilySearch a … [read full article]
Boundaries are one of my fascinations, among many other things and one thing I notice with myself is how thin and flexible and fluid they can be.
I admire how we
… [read full article]Connectionism and computationalism aren’t mutually exclusive and they are compatible but Pinker’s view has almost no such compromise to any significant degree. You can bring in Ramachandran and I’ll probably find Ramchandran agreeable to my view. But Ramachandran does not affect Pinker. This is from 1998 but I have not seen a fundamental shift in Pinker since. He misrepresents connectionism then rejects his misrepresentation in no uncertain terms. “We conclude that connectionists’ claims about the dispensability of rules in explanations in the psychology of language must be rejected, and that, on the contrary, the linguistic and developmental facts provide good evidence for such rules.”
Connectionism and computationalism aren’t … [read full article]