Stu Mack wow! Thank you!
I’ve always had a huge problem with proper categorization / grouping or maybe its naming / labeling or contextual?
In my mind most everything is “that thing is a thing doing the thing with the other thing in the thing-like way, like how that other thing when the different thing interacted with the kind of foggy vague hint of thingness that the different thing shows in its thingly different other thingish way, ya know right?”
so a lot of scrambling not only to understand but to be understood
last bunch of years I’ve been trying to understand human knowledge categorization, latching onto the only one that I really do through experience which is Dewey decimal
but like I guess it’s the experience of experiencing, like this sheer amazement at processing, bringing it in, the mechanisms and machinery doing what it do, and the experiencer experiencing and annempting to demonstate in words, which are both living and cold things depending on the success of communicating just how thingly thinging the things thinging is at that ephemeral transient moment