So it’s likely I would provide it freely or at low cost and without exclusivity.

That is a difficult question.
I find it morally challenging to have a profit motive for what I consider a good theory to be: informational.

So it’s likely I would provide it freely or at low cost and without exclusivity.

But if someone uses it for nefarious purposes, I would not feel responsible for I will have provided it at what I consider to be reasonable and not tied into potential ends. [by placing a high value on something and receiving it, I have then morally tied myself into the results, for I have profited].

i don’t know if that clarifies my perspective for you but they are my first thoughts on it.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ eight = 15

Leave a Reply