Yeah, I’d rather see double blind myself. Even if it’s not perfect, it’s still less prone to bias/error/potential favoritism than having the reviewers know who wrote the articles.
Single blind, to me adds the potential for undue influence on the system. People are people after all and as much as we try do, we all play favorites sometimes, even if unintentional.
I suppose remaining single blind won’t kill it but it’d be nice to see double-blind.