Start with two Groups: A and B.
Group A is known.
Group B will appear later.
a) List reasonable properties to GROUP A.
b) Bring up property of belong to GROUP B without mentioning GROUP B.
c) Show how absurd property of GROUP B is by attempting to map it to GROUP A.
This only works for humor as mapping between GROUP A and GROUP B is implied but never stated.
Conclusion: This is a silly form of humor and even more ridiculous as “talking points”.
It’s not a point. It’s incorrect. Why would I spread incorrect?
I know what being led down a garden path is and how not to be. It’s why I don’t watch documentaries.
Humans are more like humans than dogs are like humans.
This is why this comparison you are making is flawed to its core.