Rupert Sheldrake,
morphogenic fields – I love the concept and I agree with bits of it oddly enough but not to his degree
Kenneth R. Miller, — i’m going to follow up with his stuff : i’ve probably read his stuff before because it sure seems familiar. Pro evolution Roman catholic scientist. i’ll have to check my notes. 
and Francisco J. Ayala – Took a advantage of some women and kept doing it despite being told repeatedly to stop by admins, lost his status but:
has a clever anti intelligent design argument:
“he argued that creationist beliefs run counter to theological concepts. For example, orthodox Christian beliefs posit the existence of an omnipotent benevolent Creator despite the fact that the world is filled with predators, diseases, and other so-called “evils.” He notes that attributing these defects to an “intelligent designer” calls into question the Creator’s omnipotence and benevolence. However, by attributing these defects to the trial-and-error process of natural selection, the Creator is absolved of the responsibility of evil in the world.”