Reading responses to criticisms about the “Pristine Experience” concept. It’s all caps in the response so I’m repeating it as is. There’s further in this paper (which is free with an account with Mendeley, which is free) PRISTINE EXPERIENCE IS NOT A MENTALISM, NOT A MENTAL STATE, NOT A COGNITIVE STATE, NOT A PROCESS “PRIVATE” DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY NON-OBSERVABLE “PRIVATE” IS NOT THE SAME THING AS “SUBJECTIVE” DESCRIPTIONS OF PRISTINE INNER EXPERIENCE ARE NOT METAPHORS https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/response-commentary-inner-experience-apprehended-high-fidelity-examining-brain-activation-experience/

Reading responses to criticisms about the “Pristine Experience” concept. It’s all caps in the response so I’m repeating it as is. There’s further in this paper (which is free with an account with Mendeley, which is free)
 
PRISTINE EXPERIENCE IS NOT A MENTALISM, NOT A MENTAL STATE, NOT A COGNITIVE STATE, NOT A PROCESS
 
“PRIVATE” DOES NOT NECESSARILY
IMPLY NON-OBSERVABLE
 
“PRIVATE” IS NOT THE SAME THING AS
“SUBJECTIVE”
 
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRISTINE INNER
EXPERIENCE ARE NOT METAPHORS
 
https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/response-commentary-inner-experience-apprehended-high-fidelity-examining-brain-activation-experience/
 
-=—-

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× 5 = ten

Leave a Reply