Call it Quantum and you get people to go “oooh!”.  sigh

I read this.  Interesting read.  Looks very useful.  COULD it be called Quantum annealing?  Sure.  But it could also be called, *”HEY LET’S USE 2 VARIABLES instead of 1 in the height dimension and make it shakey (quantum) so then we get…


I hate BS wrapped up in spooky fundable terms like Quantum and Spin Glass (everybody loves Spin Glass now – all the rage; I like it too because it has… MEMORYYYY PROPERTIESSS…. just like USSSSSSssss”…. [ so do a lot of things that we humans have  trouble writing the formulas to get math to predict … because _MATH is fundamentally one dimensional itself … ya-know… the *number line?  – and we get all spooked over Pi because it’s circle drawn in TWO DIMENSIONSS…….. and doesn’t fit in 1 dimension and cracks the number line.  duh . ]

Not knocking math or the research… just the spookiness factor of it.  It’s still cool but JUST CALL IT RANDOMIZED at key points instead of quantum and skip the BS.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

six × = 54

Leave a Reply