The flexibility of English is one of its most marvelous features. I love knowing it morphs and changes and have had the opportunity to watch it do so in my own lifetime. Some languages have an Language Academy and new words have to be approved by the Elite. But English? Anybody can modify it and communities do so all of the time. It’s beautiful.

Posted on by Leave a comment
The flexibility of English
… [read full article]
 

Of course. I mean, outside of a prosecution POV, there’s not a lot of distinction between someone locally who believes and/or wants to actualize election interference by interfering in the election and somebody from outside doing the same thing; both are inspired to prove the same point made by the same source; to show that “Trump was right” If you know of a competing reason of which there’s as much significant past evidence unrelated to Trump’s claims I’d love to hear it but it’s likely simply MAGA, whether foreign or domestic. The question is : what do you do at that point?

Posted on by Leave a comment
Of course. I mean,
… [read full article]
 

Generally, people are not put into positions by performance UNLESS the system they’re working within ‘rewards’ you for doing so. For example, schools may reward you with grades. It’s set up that way. Corporations may increase you pay if you follow certain duties if it’s arranged that way. Kiss the right asses in networking and maybe you’ll be placed in a higher position by a gatekeeper who allows you passage. But it’s not “what comes from within” there. It’s what system are you attempting to climb up within.

Posted on by Leave a comment

Generally, people are not … [read full article]

 

It’s land domain. In a hyper local election, everything is very nearly direct. You as a voter are likely to know the person running from around town and if you don’t, you can find out. It’s very direct, people in town, people you know, every decision directly affects most anything you do in a local community. Next level up you have a city. Then a county. Then a district. Then a state. then you have Federal. Now if you make poor decisions in a local village, it only affects that village. But city level is more serious. A county even more than a city, etc. as you go up. So, that’s why a village/borough level should be ok for any village/borough that wants to go that route, especially of a significant amount of people who live there are working, have their kids in school, yet are undocumented themselves. They should have some say about what affects their kids in school. But that doesn’t also mean that they get to have a say in what the State education board or the federal board of education has to say.

Posted on by Leave a comment
It’s land domain.
In
… [read full article]
 

US Constitution is not so important to me here. Rather, what is good for a society. US Constitution is one example. There’s certainly others as well, real and fictional, but I don’t go around putting them on a tier system. Rather, I look to see what’s structurally important to me. To me, a right to vote should be primary in a hierarchical system in which people are deigned to represent you in decision-making. So, I would have the right to be vote be of top importance and extend to everybody on the soil of the land that is affected by the decisions made by the representatives elected. Prisoners, the mentally feeble, children, they would all also have a right to vote that is protected and anonymous just as those who vote now do. From proper representation comes proper decision making – in theory. Now, I see the tying of representation to land-masses to be flawed as well, but I don’t have an answer for that. I do believe in greater control at more local levels and weaker control at larger land masses, however they would be in the order of general people management that allows for maximal individual freedom/opportunity/etc.

Posted on by Leave a comment
US Constitution is not
… [read full article]