At this point, it
… [read full article]Now by asserting “Author” status am I participating in a hierarchy or am I reminding cooperatively agreed upon “rules of the road”? I view it as the 2nd, you likely view it as the 1st. But they can achieve the same result.
Now by asserting “Author” … [read full article]
Our locus of control is different. My locus of control is internal and yours is external. But because conflict is external, you lack control.
Our locus of control … [read full article]
The person I was going back and forth with for a while got really quiet after I replied: “We’re not debating. I’m explaining, but it takes time.” Maybe I hit below the belt a little there.
The person I was
… [read full article]It would be a poor manager that was in constant conflict with everybody, quite the opposite of a “well-oiled machine” which is the goal of any functional system.
We’re not debating. I’m
We’re not debating. I’m explaining but it takes time. Growth is through everchanging, continual minor (with occasional major punctuated) frustrations along with ongoing cooperations. Far more cooperation than conflict otherwise systems would fail. “Conflict” brings up images of silly childish battles and wargames.
We’re not debating. I’m
… [read full article](via bot) are simply agreeing with me. It takes constant work to preserve their status. It is not automatic. These human hierarchies only exist through continual application of force or threat of force. They are unnatural, artificial structures that struggle to maintain themselves; sandcastles built on floating swampland
(via bot) are simply
… [read full article]