To have a comparison, … [read full article]
No, because men still have an automatic advantage, even in your organization. If you hired a man for that position, they immediately gain the privilege of using the men’s bathroom, a luxury barred in your organization for women you hire. Equally qualified. One gets the nice bathroom. The other does not.
No, because men still … [read full article]
Nominalization is a useful feature of English and many other languages. It turns verbs into nouns. But, the context of the discussion I pulled this from, I was arguing that an eternal platonic comparison is not possible, as comparison is an action and actions need time to operate. In the platonic realm of Forms, there is no change, no time, no action. Standard logic and much of mathematics operates in this realm, ignoring the computation effort and time required to solve. So, an “eternal comparison” is not possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalization
Nominalization is a useful … [read full article]
I wrote this and I like it even out of context: Critical to remember is that “comparison” is nominalization of the action of comparing. Comparing is action. Action is change. Action occurs over time. You _could_ consider “being” an action but if it is being without start or finish, birth or death and is eternal, no action takes place. No comparison is possible because comparison is comparing, which is an action, which always takes place across time.
I wrote this and … [read full article]
Indeed. They can stand eternally, not in contrast but as a thing-in-itself, performing no function nor action nor meaning. Just ‘is’.
Indeed. They can stand … [read full article]
” The display flashed: 1379 Gaps Found. 23.” I remembered the dream in a piano store attached to a broken down bowling alley from 3 years ago after I saw the Lion with the Tuxedo.
” The display flashed: … [read full article]
Y2K+19
Y2K+19
… [read full article]