Problem: It requires full agreement, happy agreement and commitment. Full stop. You don’t need utilitarianism anymore. You can replace utilitarianism with ANY system that has full agreement, happy agreement and commitment.

Problem: It requires full agreement, happy agreement and commitment.

Full stop. You don’t need utilitarianism anymore. You can replace utilitarianism with ANY system that has full agreement, happy agreement and commitment.

—–

Hypothetical question: If everyone agreed and agreed happily to the demands of utilitarianism and their utilitarian purpose, would such a world inhabited by fully committed utilitarians be the most moral world?

=====

I understand. But for myself, I lean heavily towards pragmatism, which makes it progressively more and more difficult to entertain hypotheticals the further and further they are from observable reality.

Sadly, it makes it hard for me to im

======

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× 2 = six

Leave a Reply