“preponderance of the evidence” I think is the phrase for civil trials. I mean, it’s as if it wouldn’t matter what case was brought against him for any reason: for some people it will always and only be ever seen a politically motivated by some people. It’s impossible to get past that. A conclusion before the start and that remains the conclusion, always. No amount of evidence can overcome.

“preponderance of the evidence” I think is the phrase for civil trials. I mean, it’s as if it wouldn’t matter what case was brought against him for any reason: for some people it will always and only be ever seen a politically motivated by some people.
It’s impossible to get past that. A conclusion before the start and that remains the conclusion, always. No amount of evidence can overcome.

[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]