Paul Follows “for us humans in our working ranges” is implied as i’ve yet to communicate with non humans on these topics knowingly I would love to talk to beings that could see objects flitting in and out of human-coherent states and describe it

Paul Follows “for us humans in our working ranges” is implied as i’ve yet to communicate with non humans on these topics knowingly

I would love to talk to beings that could see objects flitting in and out of human-coherent states and describe it

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× four = 8

Leave a Reply