Our conceptualization of dimensions is a limitation of our biology and encoded in most of our logic, mathematics and physics, with some notable exceptions.
Point, line, box, cube, cube across time, cube’s effect on gravity field across time (or invert that or both) all contain artifacts of our limitations.
Imagine, instead if we had 360 degree vision, out and in, down past?
What would you see?
How different would the perspective of creatures with that ability be from our own? How would that creature create [or discover if you’re prickly about that but since formulations are traceable across time, I call them created) mathematics, logic, physics?
So, I woke up with that thinking. I went through the mental process of imagining it.
What you’d end up with is something skin to 360 radar vision.
So would everybody else.
How different would your perspectives be then?
If you could see through all objects including yourself and beyond, the difference between perspectives wouldn’t be as there as much.
Think about it:
What angles would you be missing?
So, why do you need angles if you’re not missing any?
Why do you need points if you see fields as they are?
Be sure to have gravitational warping.
If you add the history of objects to your vision backwards through time as part of the field, you’ve got a far more solid foundation for your mathematics, logic and physics than we have now and it wouldn’t even require any kind of futuristic time travel. We can still keep the present moment and the ‘archiving’ of the past (at least we believe that the present is an accumulation of the past at present).
So, morning thoughts. Hi!
http://ift.tt/2melA7Y
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]