otherwise you start seeing great self-supporting circles are perfectly logical/mathematical (interchangable) but have no leg to stand on otherwise.

Oh the Quantum Darwinism is interesting stuff. Still, it suffers from the same bootstrapping problem of Darwinism – the “Give me one free miracle and we’ll explain the rest” of some of the parts of the theoretical sciences that attempt to enclose concepts ‘once and for all’.

it doesn’t invalidate of course; I tend towards chaos and complexity theories alike – but as far as impetus goes, the only prudent thing is to remain agnostic about it scientifically, otherwise you start seeing great self-supporting circles are perfectly logical/mathematical (interchangable) but have no leg to stand on otherwise.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


three − = 1

Leave a Reply