“Ontological pluralism is not naïve relativism.” https://www.greenbiz.com/article/implications-ontological-plurality I’m grateful for the postmodern era and what relativism has done, particularly for physics and cultural studies. But I think an ontological pluralism is a better approach as it can address, for example, why scientists can hit a brick wall when they make political suggestions: the languages are different, the worldviews are different, the whole approach to reality is … different – and not everything translates across ontologies. (or schemata)

“Ontological pluralism is not naïve relativism.”
https://www.greenbiz.com/article/implications-ontological-plurality
 
I’m grateful for the postmodern era and what relativism has done, particularly for physics and cultural studies. But I think an ontological pluralism is a better approach as it can address, for example, why scientists can hit a brick wall when they make political suggestions: the languages are different, the worldviews are different, the whole approach to reality is … different – and not everything translates across ontologies. (or schemata)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


two × 2 =

Leave a Reply