One of the ways I use AI to help me understand a confusing reading: I ask it to summarize in a middle school, high school and college level. This steps me into it. For example:
2 — Significance of gender for Thurkill’s project
Middle-school
Thurkill shows that men who wrote the old stories used Mary and Fatima to teach how women should behave and to make political points.
High-school
Gender is a lens Thurkill uses to read hagiography: male theologians and hagiographers create feminine ideals (pure, submissive, miraculous mothers) and then use those images to define community boundaries and political claims. The book argues we should read these images as rhetorical moves rather than straightforward reflections of women’s lived experience.
College
Thurkill treats gender not as background but as an operative rhetorical technology. Male authors produce ambivalent images (inimitable yet exemplary; submissive yet politically potent) to negotiate theological claims (e.g., Christology, the Imamate) and dynastic legitimacy (Merovingian Marian appropriation; Shi`ite Fatima as source of Imamate). The gendered images function to naturalize sectarian boundaries while preserving patriarchal authority (the holy woman legitimizes male office without displacing male authority).
—-
I prefer the high school level most of the time as sometimes the college level gets a little too specific for me but it depends on the subject. In some I find the high school level too simple. Sometimes the middle school level is ideal
I don’t use this all of the time, just when something is a little thickly worded and my brain just isn’t ‘getting it’. Once I get the ‘gist’ though, now I can read it normally as I have a focus to work around.
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]