ok this framework might not be enough! I need to add “assumptions and approaches”? I think?
They SEEM to differ in their “aspects of a paradigm”. But when I ask, the answer is “not the best way to phrase it”
—-
so, do they differ in aspects of a paradigm? Is that a good way to phrase it?
The two models may differ in aspects of their paradigms, but this is not necessarily a good way to describe the differences between them. A paradigm is a broad theoretical framework or set of assumptions that underpins a particular field of study, and it is typically used to describe the fundamental principles and ideas that guide research in that field. In the case of the random walk model and the detrended fluctuation analysis model, both models are based on the fundamental principles of mathematics and statistical analysis, so they may share many aspects of their paradigms.
However, the two models may differ in the specific assumptions and approaches that they use to analyze the data. For example, the random walk model may assume that the system follows a random, unpredictable path, while the detrended fluctuation analysis model may assume that the fluctuations in the data exhibit self-similarity at different scales. These differences in assumptions and approaches may be considered as differences in aspects of the paradigms used by the two models.
Overall, it is not accurate to say that the two models differ in their paradigms, as both models are based on the fundamental principles of mathematics and statistical analysis. However, it is possible to describe the specific differences in their assumptions and approaches as differences in aspects of their paradigms.