oh wait: no, i don’t have to listen to this. I can simplify that there is a complex layered relationship of peoples in groups to property and to property usage that is varied and stratified – can be seen as “layers” operating simultaneously. I’ll assume it is true for all humans for all time and move to animal interspecies communication.

oh wait: no, i don’t have to listen to this. I can simplify that there is a complex layered relationship of peoples in groups to property and to property usage that is varied and stratified – can be seen as “layers” operating simultaneously.

I’ll assume it is true for all humans for all time and move to animal interspecies communication.

[prior:

Animals worldwide have “Territory”. Humans _apparently_ have “Property”, but is Property a Eurocentric notion? I looked to see about Colonial Native American property notions to see if anybody had specialized in this area and indeed, I found this 2018 book. I can’t find the book so I’ll hear a podcast and hope it’s enough.
Property and Dispossession: Natives, Empires and Land in Early Modern North America (Studies in North American Indian History) ]
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


five − 1 =

Leave a Reply