oh nice! A minor shift (not a structural change) shifted “Management by type” to central instead of “Asymmetry” (there are a lot of ways to measure what’s central in complex graphs) “Asymmetry” and “Management by type” are in the same grouping – they just shifted places (and may shift back – they’re probably really close). This is very interesting to me as “Type” is a powerful concept. “Type” is a marker of asymmetry.

oh nice! A minor shift (not a structural change) shifted “Management by type” to central instead of “Asymmetry” (there are a lot of ways to measure what’s central in complex graphs)

“Asymmetry” and “Management by type” are in the same grouping – they just shifted places (and may shift back – they’re probably really close).

This is very interesting to me as “Type” is a powerful concept. “Type” is a marker of asymmetry.

Kenneth Udut

I’m going to take that whole “Management by Type” / “Asymmetry” group and remove all of these head categories and regroup them and see if new patterns form, giving it an independent existence.—

 

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ three = 11

Leave a Reply