Of course. I mean, outside of a prosecution POV, there’s not a lot of distinction between someone locally who believes and/or wants to actualize election interference by interfering in the election and somebody from outside doing the same thing; both are inspired to prove the same point made by the same source; to show that “Trump was right” If you know of a competing reason of which there’s as much significant past evidence unrelated to Trump’s claims I’d love to hear it but it’s likely simply MAGA, whether foreign or domestic. The question is : what do you do at that point?

Of course. I mean, outside of a prosecution POV, there’s not a lot of distinction between someone locally who believes and/or wants to actualize election interference by interfering in the election and somebody from outside doing the same thing;
both are inspired to prove the same point made by the same source; to show that “Trump was right”
If you know of a competing reason of which there’s as much significant past evidence unrelated to Trump’s claims I’d love to hear it but it’s likely simply MAGA, whether foreign or domestic.
The question is : what do you do at that point?
[responsivevoice_button voice="US English Male"]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ 6 = fifteen

Leave a Reply