Allow me to show you something:
When I ran 9000+ of my little writings through the past 28 yrs (I think a book report on Black Holes in 10th grade made it in there too, so that’s… wait, yeah 28), that awesome little tool at http://act-dl.base-search.net/textclassifier (which is just one tool of many I’m using in self-analysis to get a somewhat objective perspective of self), and I properly accounted for quantity as well as certainty, I came up with this top four:
Time 115
Epistemology, causation & humankind 120
Causation 122
Philosophy & Theory 401
This surprised me because of its accuracy to how I think of myself yet didn’t expect it to come out like this.
Now, What is Philosophy & Theory 401?
Well, I correlated it to the Library of Congress system and got these:
“Psycholinguistics
Symbolic language
us: Language, Psychology of
us: Language and languages–Psychological aspects
us: Language and languages–Psychology
us: Psychology of language
us: Speech–Psychology
us: Cartesian linguistics
us: Cognitive grammar
us: Communicative competence
us: Competence and performance (Linguistics)
us: Creativity (Linguistics)
us: Generative grammar
us: Innateness hypothesis (Linguistics)
us: Language acquisition
us: Language and emotions
us: Language awareness
us: Masked priming
us: Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
us: Sound symbolism
us: Speech errors
us: Speech perception
us: Xenophobia in language
as subtopics.
It’s In short, it’s a different form of philosophy than you might be speaking of.
You may be in DDC 142: Critical Philosophy.
or 180-189 – ancient to modern Western Philosophy.
Or perhaps Philosophy & Theory 501 – which is Science and Mathematics.
In short… we may be working from within two different systems which happen to share similar language.