My passionate earlier response, I apologize for. I was fighting phantasms, not what was present.

My passionate earlier response, I apologize for. I was fighting phantasms, not what was present.

I interpreted an attack on the mask system and assumed you wished for a formulation of authenticity to replace it with. I was mistaken in my assumption. I’m ok with any system that’s workable, as long as it has some form of non-destructive applicability.

I’ll stand by what I’ve said, but as the magic wand statement on my part was flippant and unrelated, feel free to toss it out. I apologize for that bit of ridiculousness and also for my tone. I believe in a primacy of civility whenever possible and I fail that on occasion].

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


2 + eight =

Leave a Reply