My only point is: I picked someone at random, looking to see if they were known to be connected to pseudoscientific groups and questionable affiliations with shadowy funding and evasive about connections, and my first random hit was a success. Not every research scientist would be this easy to find connected to such things. I don’t know. I’m not going through all of them here. I’m just saying that it’s not without cause that I believe that it was dismissed because of questionable affiliations of the scientists. I can certainly be wrong.

My only point is: I picked someone at random, looking to see if they were known to be connected to pseudoscientific groups and questionable affiliations with shadowy funding and evasive about connections, and my first random hit was a success.
Not every research scientist would be this easy to find connected to such things.
I don’t know. I’m not going through all of them here. I’m just saying that it’s not without cause that I believe that it was dismissed because of questionable affiliations of the scientists.
I can certainly be wrong.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× seven = 63

Leave a Reply