make it uniquely distinctive from any other systemic methodology for truth-value discernment.

Of course an equally likely possibility is that I’m being excessively flippant and haven’t a clue at the depths this can go that make it uniquely distinctive from any other systemic methodology for truth-value discernment. After all, that *is* its raison d’etre.  :) But no flippancy is intended, so apologies if that was at all perceived  :)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


1 + = ten

Leave a Reply