Jack Sinclair If it’s your primary claim that any choice humans make is humans nature (whatever the source of their choices, whether
“free” or
“environment” or
“compelled” or
“genetic” –
“illusionary” –
pick an adjective), then that’s that for that argument.
I take as a given that there is a set of attributes _possible_ in the totality of human nature.
But what of the individual? That’s my focus.
Now to a)
Education: I wasn’t talking about smarts. I was talking about power structure learned from the age 5+
b) Kitty Genoese is a familiar name but it is outside of what we were talking about. I’d need to reset parameters for that as you probably picked something that needs a difference angle.
c) Let us suppose that In person a) brutality lay dormant. It will not activate unless provoked by extreme circumstances.
Person b) brutality is an everyday affair.
B destroys A due to brutality.
Person C says: It is human nature that B destroyed A.
Person D says: Then why did A not destroy B and showed no signs of brutality?