I’ve been writing in “post modern” for a VERY long time. It unfortunately comes too easily to me.

I’ve been writing in “post modern” for a VERY long time. It unfortunately comes too easily to me. It sucks really, because I forget I do it and then I wonder why people don’t understand me sometimes, unless they speak the postmodern language and yes, it’s crap, but you said ‘ontology’ which sparked it. tongue emoticon

Anyway, existence of a deity.

Going by your definition:
“i cannot claim knowledge of the existence nor the not existence of a god “

Ok, this is the excluded middle I was talking about.

You cannot claim knowledge of the existence and the not existence simultaneously because they appear to be a logical contradiction.

But I can. Because I don’t know. I can have superimposed beliefs that appear contradictory but they are not because they depend on context, not on text.

If something doesn’t make sense, ask and i’ll rephrase.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


− 4 = three

Leave a Reply