It’s possible that there could one day be an extreme population drop

Even within the Sciences, there’s homophobia that’s not directly related to religion, especially among some evolutionary biologists.

But it’s a modern morality to accept it, just as it was once a morality to not accept it. One replaces the other. Which one is correct? I don’t think there is an objective moral measurement possible. It’s whatever “the times” dictates.

It’s possible that there could one day be an extreme population drop. Natural disaster, war, consequences of economics, whatever. At that point, it’s possible the culture’s morality might shift into making non-baby-making partnerships immoral, with boatloads of justifications for that.

It’s whatever the times dictates.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× 1 = two

Leave a Reply